I’m going to start blogging again. But I’m going to make some disclaimers and set some ground rules.
First, I will be posting each blog in various forums. My own web site, the Patch, Facebook, etc. You should take note that when I blog or comment on news articles, I do so as an individual, expressing my own views, not to be considered the views of the school board, its individual members, or employees of the school district. If through my official duties as president of the school board, I am required to offer comment to the media through a district press release, it will be noted as such. But comments made in that capacity will never be released through blogging forums or social media.
My ability to edit and moderate varies, depending on the forum. That being the case, I ask that comments remain on topic. If you want to maintain a forum of personal attacks, feel free to start your own blog. This blog, however, is about my personal views on school district business, my vision for the future, my frustrations with the education world, and my desire to share these views, along with pertinent district information with the citizenry. Why? Because I can. I want people to know me and what I believe in. You can only fit so much information on an 8X5 election flyer. I feel that if I’m going to ask for your vote, you have a right to know who you are (or aren’t) voting for.
I love discussion and debate with rational people that are willing to deliberate the issue. When it becomes a band of bullies hijacking a thread to complain about everything I’ve ever done to infuriate you, it serves no purpose. I know I make some people unhappy. As the old cliché goes- you can’t please everyone. So, in order to garner meaningful input and stimulate discussion that doesn’t cause decent folks click on to a new page, I am instituting a distasteful new aspect to my blogs; censorship. Unless you can somehow, in a clever and snarky fashion, work in pertinent comments regarding my injunction against the school board, my status as a licensed cosmetologist, the fact that I wore a black and gold hood to graduation, etc., it had better be on topic or it will be deleted, when I have the ability. I will ask Patch to acquiesce to these terms, but I cannot control comment moderation in their case. But I can control my contributions to that forum. So if you want to comment on my views, you will do so in a polite and on topic manner or you won’t have the opportunity to comment at all. This is not to say you can’t disagree and make your disapproval of me known. For instance:
Let’s pretend the district couldn’t pass 10 levies in a row and teachers had to be laid off. I decide to write a blog explaining that though regrettable, there was just not enough money to keep current staff. If your comment states “you shouldn’t have worn colors to graduation and pretended you went to a real college.”- It will be deleted. However, if your comment says- “Only a hair dresser would try to justify cuts this bad.”- That would be acceptable. So my friends and frenemies, ask yourself before posting- is this comment on topic?
The next disclaimer should be self-evident, but for whatever reason, I have to remind the masses that I am a human being, (pausing for sarcastic thoughts running through some minds), with a personality, life experiences, proficiencies, deficiencies, and demeanor that are unique to me. I’m not as politically correct as some would like, I’m not as uncompromising as some would like. I’ll never be the perfect politician; I can’t always use the professional voice. I make tpyo’s. I’m an easy going person and my personality comes out, especially when I blog. If you want politically correct sound bites, I suggest you check out www.whitehouse.gov. For those of you that just had a coronary, calm down, it’s called humor. For those of you that smiled, I look forward to dialogue.
Wanda Minor
11:22 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Glad to see you're back!
Kellie Patterson
2:15 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Thanks!
IMHO
11:10 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013
You can disclaimer until your hair comes back in style. Your personal views and comments effect your decisions as a BOE member so there is no separating the blogging Kellie from the BOE President Kellie. Did I win, did I stay on topic?
Robin Anderson
11:27 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Sorry, buttercup. While you "stayed on topic", anonymous "citizens" aren't eligible "to win"...they only get an asterisk by their post.
Kellie Patterson
2:25 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Of course my views and comments AFFECT my decisions. And technically, you don't win. Because you made up a topic. I never tried to separate Kellie from Kellie, I'm separating Kellie's views from other board members, employee's of the school district, and the governing body views. Please re-read what I said.
But since you worked "disclaimer" into your insult, I'll let the comment stand. Although I'm deducting 2 points for using "effect" in the wrong context.
Not impressed
12:06 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
As most elected officials have learned, it is simply not possible to separate a public persona with a private one. Nice try.
Kellie Patterson
2:14 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Since you seem confused, I'll explain. What I said was "...I do so as an individual, expressing my own views, not to be considered the views of the school board, its individual members, or employees of the school district."
I've always been the same person, never two different people, Mrs. impressed.
Adam C. Miller
12:56 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Welcome back!
Kellie Patterson
2:28 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Thanks Adam!
Earl Elevant
1:04 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Hello narcissism.
Not impressed
2:26 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Persona: (according to Merriam-Webster) the personality that a person- as an actor or politician- projects in public. Person and persona are not interchangeable. There's no confusion on my part, I wasn't trying to insinuate that you are two different people. I was stating that it is impossible to separate you as an inidividual from you as a public figure. Anything you state on your blog will be considered when voting against (or for) you in any election, and to assume otherwise is naive.
Kellie Patterson
12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
You are obviously confused. No one asked you to separate me from the public figure. I never claimed there was a separation. Of course what I say on my blog reflects my opinion in the board room as well. I've never stated otherwise.
Steve Lyons
1:00 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
hi
wmfr
9:13 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
So disappointing to read this from Kellie Patterson. I really think that she is a narcissist. I've never seen anything like this, I did not want to comment because, I don't want to bring attention to her article. I can only hope that she gets things straight at some point and grows with her position.
I don't think anyone should be personally attacking her either based on profession or whatever. I do think though she is open game on the things she writes. I just think Kellie needs some guidance and leadership from someone that has been in her role maybe. I am sincerely hoping she steps up.
Robin Anderson
10:58 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
Ha! I love it. Yet another anonymous weenie offering their sage advice.
wmfr
11:15 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
Better than a known jackass "ehhhhhhhh"
Robin Anderson
5:40 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Ah, yes...yet another anonymous twit from the peanut gallery. Well, I'm your huckleberry, budger. Take your best shot...like I care, eh?
wmfr
5:53 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Care enough to keep replying, so it seems you do. When you say peanut gallery you are referring to most of the posters ehhhhhh? Since majority feel way I do about the issue. I love how you are quick to call names and show no respect of others opinions and get upset when called a jackass. Well, it is an accurate way to describe you.
John McMillan
11:07 am on Saturday, February 9, 2013
Well, so far the interaction has been quite stimulating...good job, folks!