patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Voters Strike Down Woodridge Local Schools Levy

Issue 5 failed by just 90 votes on Tuesday night; however, another five-year, 6.83-mill levy is on the way this November.

 

The voters have spoken: Issue 5 has been rejected.

Tonight’s results mark the third levy failure in the last 10 months for the Woodridge Local Schools. 

The next move is to focus on passing a levy identical to Issue 5 in November.

If passed, the five-year, 6.83-mill levy would generate $15 million in revenue and cost homeowners $209 per year for every $100,000 in valuation, said Woodridge Local Schools Superintendent Walter Davis.

In the event the November issue fails, the Woodridge Board of Education would need to approve seven-figure cuts ($1.2 million in personnel, $600,000 in employee benefits) to keep the budget balanced and in the black through 2015, said Woodridge School treasurer Deanna Levenger.

If approved by the board, the next round of cuts would go into effect on July 1, 2013.  

These are the final unofficial results from the Summit County Board of Elections:

Issue       

For the Levy*   

Against the Levy*

Issue 5

1,625

1,715

*Unofficial results

Related Topics: Levy, Woodridge Local Schools, and issue 5

Adam C. Miller

9:16 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Wait, they're putting this on the ballot in November? When will they get the hint...

Comment_arrow

Earl Elevant

11:56 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

These are the same people who wonder why their kids don't stop asking when they're told "NO" the first time.

Comment_arrow

Concerned Citizen

12:23 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

It is truly sad that people see a vote "no" on a school levy as an opportunity to have Washington, or Columbus, hear their "voices" against modern politics. Why would a responsible parent continue working in a school that pays far less than other districts? They would not. Therefore, if the "no" voters main goal is to drop teachers' pay and benefits to what would be far below those in other districts, 4 things will happen: 1) young teachers will leave Woodridge either by force or by their own accord- to work in a more secure district, and 2) electives, sports and many other opportunities WILL be taken away from students.3) the performance of the District will drop substantially, and 4) property values WILL drop far more than the approx. $210 per $100,000 of home value that this levy would cost. Peoples' logical thought processes are so lost in the polarized politics of the day that they are going to end up causing themselves large problems and sinking a school system. Woodridge Local Schools is not Congress. Administrators, teachers and students in our district are not politicians. This is a district that has managed money very well, that pays its staff wages very comparable to the rest of Ohio. It is not the district's "fault" that it depends on tax money to operate. It is simply a fact. If you are angry with the "system"- then call your congressman. Don't assume that he'll hear your "no" vote on a school levy as some sort of "message" as you sink your school district.

THOMAS KANE

9:53 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I don t know, but my taxes just shot up near 60 .00 more yr.Did We pass a levy in the Falls this year past?This is why I didnt vote for it unless it was a safety forces issue or something life affecting like that.

Dale Patterson

9:58 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Get the hint? Is the hint we are supposed to damage our school system and as a result hurt our kids. According to the numbers we will run into a negative situation without a levy. What kind of message are we giving our kids?

Comment_arrow

Earl Elevant

11:59 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The message is:
Sometimes you don't have the money you want to spend on things, so you have to adjust accordingly and spend within your means.

It's an excellent lesson.

Comment_arrow

Michael Thomas

8:51 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Give me a break. Why do you think money is always the answer.
Find other solutions. Like cutting the excessive spending. Don't give me the baloney about sacrificing children's education. That argument is getting old. Mike

Comment_arrow

I.M. Wright

8:53 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

"Find other solutions. Like cutting the excessive spending."

And people like you making this unsubstantiated statement is past-the-point of "getting old." In fact, it's outright archaic. Prove the "excessive spending" people like you love to pull out of your arse w/out backing up.

Comment_arrow

Tom

9:11 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Yes, what excessive spending do you see?

Comment_arrow

Tom

9:16 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

You know Michael you are also saying money is the answer. What is cutting spending but a money issue?

Wanda Minor

10:06 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I'm telling my kids that they have to live with what they have, just like we do.

Betsy

10:09 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The message that the system is BROKEN and throwing more money at the problem DOES NOT fix it. People are finally starting to figure this out. At least people that own homes and have to pay property taxes!

Comment_arrow

Tom

8:41 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Ok, but not giving the school enough money to operate won't solve the problem either. Don't break the school, make Columbus change the funding system.

Joey

10:22 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Please explain how you would "fix it" Betsy? Funding has been cut and enrollment is up!! We have already made major cuts and refuse to sacrifice our children's education and our community's value by having a failing school system. I hope none of you have to sell your home in the next year. I mean what educated parents would buy a home is this failing unsupportive district? Please enlighten us with your solution?

Comment_arrow

Adam C. Miller

10:34 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The district isn't failing...

Comment_arrow

Tom

8:45 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Adam you are right the Woodridge district is not failing. It is doing very well on less money than it had years ago with many more students. But, without more money next year we will be forced to make so many cuts that the district will fail in giving the students a good education.

Don Corleone

11:12 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Yes, your rent may go up genius to offset the tax increase your property owner suffers as a result of waste, teacher unions, insurance hikes as a result of lawsuit happy Yaris drivers...

Comment_arrow

I.M. Wright

8:52 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

You should change your first name to DUMB because that's exactly what your comment represents.

Comment_arrow

Tom

8:54 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Yaris Drivers? What waste do you see in the district? How does the union affect this?

Comment_arrow

Mary Hodgson

9:39 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Can You comment further on the drivers?

az

12:32 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

If parents care about their own kinds then ask them to pay for it. If the teachers/staff care for children education then take a pay/benefit cut. Don't ask the home owners to pay for someone else's children's education or pay for benefits and salary for others when they themselves do not have those kinds of pay or benefit.

Comment_arrow

Tom

8:57 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Did you go to school? Who paid for that?
The staff did take cuts, both eliminating staff members and the remaining members took pay cuts and increased their benefit contribution.
You don't make a good salary or have benefits and have a job that requires a masters degree and continuing education credits?

Adam C. Miller

3:31 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Some of my family members live in the WSD and their taxes would go up $634 and $358 per year (2 families)... NONE of their kids (my cousins) go to Woodridge!!! http://fiscaloffice.summitoh.net/index.php/pending-levy-tax-estimator

Comment_arrow

Tom

9:04 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

So that first family has a $300,000 plus home and are worried about $1.74 increase per year? They can afford to send multiple children to private school. Do they drive their children their? If they do live in the district it is the districts responsibility to transport them to their private school, wherever it is.

Dave

8:13 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

If there's a levy that affects the kids programs, (sports, music, arts, etc.) Then I would happily vote for it. Employee benefits, no thanks. No tax payer money pays my benefits, they all come out of my paycheck.

Comment_arrow

Jenn Bryson

8:38 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

but sports, music, art, and p.e. HAVE already been affected. last school year the primary and intermediate school went from each having their own art and p.e. teacher to having to share one for both buildings. it was a HUGE adjustment. sports and music have been affected by this year's pay-to-participate policy.

Comment_arrow

Tom

9:06 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Dave what do you mean? Are you suggesting that tax money should only go to buying supplies and not to funding the coaches, directors and art teachers? Do you have two jobs? One to live on and one to pay for your benefits? Please explain what you mean.

I.M. Wright

8:51 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

This is ridiculous! And part of this blame falls onto the residents of the Woodridge District. The blame is NOT pressuring the district to dissolve and MERGE with either Falls or other neighboring districts!

Woodridge is a prime example of a district that can no longer sustain itself with their existing tax base. There are way too many school districts in this state as it is, and there are many districts in this same situation as Woodridge. But yet, they refuse to do the right AND responsible thing and to pursue merging with another district(s).

The school board needs to remember why they're there and whose best interests they are supposed to be serving -- THE KIDS!

The residents need to start pressuring the district to merge already.

Comment_arrow

Tom

9:10 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

How will merging solve the problem?

Jennifer Shannon

9:12 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

People that use their full given names on this site are much more credible. Grow up.

Scott Gatrell

9:29 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

I will not vote for this levy until the district stops telling me that most of the money is for teacher/staff pay and benefits. I'm tired of seeing articles about how the money will be spent when the first two items listed are always pay and benefits, then the rest of the article goes on to explain that everything but pay and benefits will be cut thus forcing the kids to pay for the pay and benefits. It's blackmail and I'm tired of it. We should fire anyone tba engages in such behavior even if we have to fire them all and start from scratch. Then I would be willing to vote for this levy. Let me just say here and now that the teachers union is absolutely responsible for this mess.

Jenn Bryson

9:34 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

woodridge's pay/benefit costs are right in line (actually a little less) than all the other districts around. pay/benefits always make up the biggest part of a budget, whether in the public or the private sector.

Comment_arrow

Joseph F.

9:48 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

A Kaiser Permanente study on health care costs in 2011 stated that the average employee conttributes 18% to their health care plan. Woodridge employees only contribute 8%. This is well below the national average. According to the treasurer the employee contribution for a family plan is $145 per month with a $300 deductible. Compare that to what you pay at your place of employment! Also didn't the treasurer just save $1 million in refinancing some bonds? I haven't had a pay raise in 3 years yet everything has gone up (food, gas, etc.). I have to make do with what I have, why can't the school board do the same?

Comment_arrow

Mary Hodgson

10:08 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Woodridge Employees make more money because more then half of there employees do not get benifets.

Comment_arrow

Jenn Bryson

10:12 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

joseph fazio, i completely agree that the employees should be paying more into health costs. i'm simply stating that the district's associated costs are in line with other districts.

Dave L

9:49 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

You know, I thought long and hard about this vote.
I thought of the kids in my neighborhood, I thought about what the levy would cost me and I thought about the teachers who refuse to go back to the bargaining table, in spite of their constant claims that they are willing to sacrifice for the children.

I decided that I'd vote FOR the levy, even though these same teachers still won't return to the bargaining table.

We'll see if they suddenly get it and are willing to put their raises aside and try to help save their fellow workers' jobs.

If not, I won't have to think about it in November. If they can't help share the burden, then I can't afford it alone either.

Mary Hodgson

10:07 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

The grounds crew would go and do personal driveways in the winter on the clock, they would also take the wood and aluminum from the old stadium and pocket the money for cleaning it up, How many decks where built with woodridge wood? Did Woodridge Benifit from it? Also, when Dr. Graham ( who did a wonderful job getting money into the district ) was forced to leave because of his personal affairs brought in people that he knew to make the replacements of certain people I believe he did it out of vengance knowing that it would in the long run hurt Woodridge! There are people we wont name in the transportation dept that have been doing the supervisors job for years and has never been compensated for it or given a Thank you for there work! There is Diana Levenger who retired from woodridge to return at the same wage? Get her out of there she is part of the problem a newer accountant can do her job at half the cost! Also who took on Waterford and Timber Top? Didn't that finally come back and bit you? There was also a truck load of paper that was lost on Quick Rd., the drivers thought it was funny and never went back to clean or pick it up. I could go on but why bother, no one listens..... there is tons of waste at Woodridge! They should send Waterford and Timber Top back to Akron where it belongs. Stop whining about money and stop cutting smaller jobs that are needed look for the waste!

Jenn Bryson

10:13 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

mary hodgson, what would "sending waterford and timber top back to akron where they belong" accomplish in your mind?

Comment_arrow

Mary Hodgson

10:27 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

It would save Woodridge money because all the people who live there are not allowed to vote for Woodridge Levies, they have to vot for Akron because they are renters not home owners.

Comment_arrow

Regina Palmer

1:55 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

FYI Mary- they do vote for the Woodridge levies because that is the district that they live in. Timbertop and the Waterford are both within the boundaries of the Woodridge district even though they are in the Akron city limits. High Hampton and Cross Creek are also Akron and still Woodridge....same thing.

Jenn Bryson

10:30 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

but woodridge would LOSE all the PROPERTY TAX money that the owners of the waterford and timber top pay.

Jenn Bryson

10:31 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

and i'm confused, are you saying that the residents there are currently not allowed to vote for levies, or under "your plan" they would not be allowed to vote for levies?

Comment_arrow

Mary Hodgson

12:09 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

They currently can not vote for Woodridge

Comment_arrow

Jenn Bryson

12:59 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

mary, you are incorrect. i don't know where you've received your information from, but timber top and waterford residents CAN vote for the woodridge levy. i know, i am a timber top resident and a PROUD supporter of the woodridge schools! i voted YES yesterday on issue 5.

Jill Kline

10:44 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Mary Hodgson - your personal attacks and accusations are a wonderful example of why no one listens to you. Of all the rumors, to accuse any one in the Graham family of NOT caring about Woodridge - is simply untrue and cruel.

Woodridge community - we will be back on in November. I am asking that all the families in all the neighborhoods please be diligent in making sure every voter in every house gets to the polls. One way our community of voters grows is our graduating 18 yr. old children and our college children. PLEASE be sure your children are registered and if they are NOT able to cast their vote here at the polls, they fill out the absentee ballot. One household can have many voters, and we need all of them. I know there are MANY MANY families without children etc that DO support our communities children EVERY time - and we THANK YOU. We need to remember all our voters in EVERY house is how we will pass this levy.

Comment_arrow

Adam C. Miller

11:01 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Check out those links I posted above... There is a Culture of Corruption throughout our state and people will continue to vote down these levies unless there is REAL reform and REAL solutions. Mr. Davis said the union wouldn't accept the terms... either will tax-payers!!!

Comment_arrow

Mary Hodgson

12:15 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

You definately misunderstood my comment. I was not attacking Dr. Graham or any of his family in any way, I said that after his decision to leave he did not care. That is my oppinion. If there where more people who would have left his personal life just that PERSONAL he probible would still be here and Woodridge would not be in this shape. Dr. Graham alway had ideas to get the levies passed so he didn't have to cut jobs! Sorry if I affended anyone!
Dr. Graham, was a wonderful Superintendent and he did leave Woodridge high and dry!

Comment_arrow

Mary Hodgson

12:21 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

I have not posted any rumors, only the things that I have seen first hand, and that is the truth and many of the woodridge employes or ex-employees can be witness to that! Don't turn this into a personal vendeta, I love Woodridge and have many friends and family in the district that also support Woodridge! I can't vote for Woodridge because I live on the wrong side of the street and after my many years of service at Woodridge that has been what bugged me the most! Not being able to vote for the school that I worked for!

Patch_comments_icon

John Deike

12:03 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Ms. Sutton's highly inappropriate comments breached Patch's Terms of Use (http://cuyahogafalls.patch.com/terms) and have been deleted.

Betty Sutton

12:03 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Cant handle The Truth..keep deleting it then...cupcakes!

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

John Deike

12:08 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

No, Betty, it was your use of inappropriate language and comments that could be construed as racist.

Jesus Christ

12:07 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Obama's communist influence sensoring The truth.

Jesus Christ

12:09 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

This levy will NEVER pass. Hug a tree... I'll bring an ax.

Jennifer Shannon

1:00 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Grow up people and use your real names when you post. Don't hide behind pseudonyms. Absolutely no one takes you seriously.

Bradley Gross

1:10 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

My family and I have owned many properties in Woodridge through the years and still currently own two houses in the district. I'm a graduate of Woodridge (Class of '89). I've been watching Woodridge go down the tubes for years and it has nothing to do with money. You can get a good education at any school if you have your parents pushing you to succeed like I did. Throwing money at a problem is definitely not the answer. I've learned that the hard way in my own businesses. Let me ask you this... if Utah spends almost HALF of what Ohio does on a per student basis... then why do they have better schools than us? If New York spends the most per student on their public schools then why do they consistently rank much lower than Ohio?

Bradley Gross

Bradley Gross

1:12 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

I'll tell you why... Teacher Unions. I personally know two people who retired just a couple of years back that now double-dip in Ohio... One makes almost $80,000 a year for the rest of her life and the other makes almost a $100,000 a year for the rest of her life. Both of these women now have new jobs that almost Double that income.... and guess what? They love living on the taxpayers dime. They're getting rich!! They can't believe the deal they got. Both now drive BMW's, and live in much nicer houses than I do.

I work hard. I don't get those kind of golden-parachute retirement benefits... maybe I should have become a teacher. I can teach. I could have had union negotiators working for me to screw the taxpayers like these women did.

What was I thinking? Oh that's right, I was raised with the idea that people have to live within their means and didn't expect unreasonable retirement benefits. Didn't it used to be that government workers were happy making less than the private sector, knowing they were serving their communities and had a certain level of job security? Now many public sector workers are making considerably more than their private sector counterparts. We the taxpayers know this.... hence why we voted down this Levy.

When times are good... fine, public workers can make more money. When times are not so good, why would should they expect a pay increase? I didn't get one. Why should they?

Comment_arrow

Jenn Bryson

1:29 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

such childish behavior- "if i can't have it, neither can you!" you're probably one of those people that thinks every child should get a trophy for participation, right? gotta keep it fair!

Bradley Gross

1:39 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

No, I teach my children that the Chinese and Indians will eat their lunch if they don't compete at the highest levels in today's global economy.

Do you think Chinese teachers make nearly what our teachers do? I can tell you they don't, yet their students are far more prepared for life than our children.

Lori Dever

1:55 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Wow Earl nice job bashing our kids and the way we parent them. I love the personal attacks when you don't live on the district or if you do you are too much of a coward to use your real name. Secondly, I do agree with the benefits Mary, however oh should really learn how to spell before posting your opinions on a public forum. My husband has 33% of his salary taken out to pay for benefits. Third, Dr Graham made a decision to leave the district , who cares, why judge? He and his family still live in the district. I think Mr Davis has performed to the best of his abilities. Once again, why are we pointing fingers. The state funding situation is what is lacking. We need to focus our energy on making changes to that. Not bashing our parenting! Lastly, at Adam, if your"cousins" don't use the bus, they get a check every year if they don't use it. Look it up!

Mohamad Ali

2:01 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Bradley...Amen! Someone with inteligence sharing Truth.

Mohamad Ali

2:04 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

$450 from Woodridge School District a year... Keep wasting your money. I love it!!!

Patch_comments_icon

John Deike

2:18 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Several messages were deleted for violating Patch's Terms of Use. http://cuyahogafalls.patch.com/terms

Patch_comments_icon

John Deike

2:53 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Due to an abundance of inappropriate responses, comments on this article have been closed. Thank you.

The editor has closed comments for this article.